Now: Between Indexical Thoughts and Indexical Thought
نویسنده
چکیده
It has long been argued that rational action necessitates having indexical thoughts. The ability to understand and generate indexical expressions is also a precondition for interacting in natural language. A rational acting agent that interacts in natural language is, thus, required to develop a proper treatment of indexicality. Treatments of indexicality in the literature have, almost always, assumed an indexical language of thought. I shall argue that, in most common cases, all indexical expressions in said language may be reduced to expressions involving only counterparts of “I” and “now”. I dismiss the language-of-thought “I” as being not indexical at all; this leaves us with “now”. First, I review past approaches to representing and reasoning about “now”, and systematically evaluate them against four criteria which I develop and motivate. Second, I push forward a totally different treatment of “now”, based on a grounded, layered agent architecture. In this architecture, the language of thought—at the top, knowledge layer—is a classical, first-order, non-indexical language; the indexical “now” features at a lower, perceptuo-motor layer. It is the reasoning process that cuts across both layers, giving rise to indexical thinking. Thus, we trade indexical thoughts for indexical thought. The proposed treatment is shown to supersede previous approaches with respect to the proposed criteria.
منابع مشابه
The Myth of Mental
Thesis: So-called "essential indexicals" in thought are indeed essential, but they are not indexical. It is not their semantics that distinguishes them but their function, their psychological role. *********** A strong contemporary current runs to the effect that the ability of an agent to project knowledge of the world into relevant action in the world depends on the ability to think indexical...
متن کاملPerceptual Concepts : In Defence of the Indexical Model François
1. Indexicality in language and thought As expression types, indexicals do not refer. Only tokens of an indexical refer, because indexical reference is achieved through relations between tokens of the indexical and other entities in the context of tokening ; entities which gain their status as referent in virtue of standing in these relations to the relevant token. For example, a token of 'I' r...
متن کاملContent Internalism about Indexical Thought
Properly understood, content internalism is the thesis that any difference between the representational contents of two individuals’ mental states reduces to a difference in those individuals’ intrinsic properties. Some of the strongest arguments against internalism turn on the possibility for two “doppelgangers” – perfect physical and phenomenal duplicates – to differ with respect to the conte...
متن کاملSources of Immunity to Error through Misidentification
In this paper I wish to draw attention to a feature of judgments expressible using indexical terms such as I, here and now and the significance this feature has for discussions of Immunity to Error through Misidentification (IEM). The feature in question is this: consider a subject who sincerely expresses a belief using an utterance of the form 'λ is F', where 'λ' is an indexical term. Suppose ...
متن کاملTowards a Cognitive Semantics for Indexical Languages
With the Logic of Demonstratives (LD), David Kaplan defines a new formal approach for indexical languages (languages containing expressions as ‘I’, ‘here’, ‘now’), introducing a double indexing into the definition of satisfiability and distinguishing the content and the character of an expression. In particular, the meaning of an indexical is provided by an ad hoc index which depends on the (ob...
متن کامل